NEW DELHI: The Madras high court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking directions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to clarify leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi ’s “vote chori” (vote theft) allegations, terming the plea “completely misconceived.”
“The petition is vague, devoid of material particulars, lacks substantive evidence, and founded solely on political claims and counter-claims. It could not be a ground to compel the ECI to issue clarifications,” the bench observed in its order on Tuesday, according to ANI.
The court imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner, to be paid to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority. It underlined that dismissal of the PIL should not be construed as its opinion on the allegations themselves, and said the poll panel remains free to take its own decisions in this matter.
Rahul Gandhi vs Election Commission
On August 7, Gandhi alleged at a press conference that the 2024 Lok Sabha elections were “choreographed” by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to benefit the BJP, calling it the only party “immune to anti-incumbency.”
Citing Congress’s “research” on voting in Karnataka’s Mahadevapura assembly segment, he alleged “vote chori” of 1,00,250 votes. The ECI dismissed the charge as “baseless” and asked Gandhi to either file a sworn declaration or apologise for his “absurd” remarks.
The Raebareli MP refused, saying he had cited ECI's own data, and had already taken oath to the Constitution as a parliamentarian.
Addressing a rally in poll-bound Bihar's Patna on September 1, he hinted at fresh disclosures, declaring he would drop a “hydrogen bomb” after the “atom bomb.”
“The petition is vague, devoid of material particulars, lacks substantive evidence, and founded solely on political claims and counter-claims. It could not be a ground to compel the ECI to issue clarifications,” the bench observed in its order on Tuesday, according to ANI.
The court imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner, to be paid to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority. It underlined that dismissal of the PIL should not be construed as its opinion on the allegations themselves, and said the poll panel remains free to take its own decisions in this matter.
Rahul Gandhi vs Election Commission
On August 7, Gandhi alleged at a press conference that the 2024 Lok Sabha elections were “choreographed” by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to benefit the BJP, calling it the only party “immune to anti-incumbency.”
Citing Congress’s “research” on voting in Karnataka’s Mahadevapura assembly segment, he alleged “vote chori” of 1,00,250 votes. The ECI dismissed the charge as “baseless” and asked Gandhi to either file a sworn declaration or apologise for his “absurd” remarks.
The Raebareli MP refused, saying he had cited ECI's own data, and had already taken oath to the Constitution as a parliamentarian.
Addressing a rally in poll-bound Bihar's Patna on September 1, he hinted at fresh disclosures, declaring he would drop a “hydrogen bomb” after the “atom bomb.”
You may also like
EC set to order pan-India SIR before the year is out
Rijiju thanks opposition MPs for VP vote, Congress 'admits' cross-voting
Home burnt, bullets rocked block: Benny Johnson remembers how Charlie Kirk sheltered his family - an unheard story
Manipur govt bans air guns in Churachandpur ahead of PM Modi's likely visit
Centre to help automobile industry expand markets, strengthen supply chains
